David Meeting Week 7 (10/03/17)

Prior to this meeting I had established that I wanted to ask about how I can go about the research process for this module, as I wanted to take a more ‘outside’ approach (objective) when critically analysing my written work. This being an ongoing development within how I tackle my own work – not being able to recognise my flaws, as this isn’t an issue, but more so what steps I can take to improve these flaws so that I am able to articulate my thoughts, feelings and situations better.

We started the meeting by discussing the practical progression of the project since the prior week. In terms of finishing off our rough drum recordings (discussed in Sessions with Pete #2), we are set to complete the rest of them during our third session together (15/03/17, we didn’t have enough time during our second session, 1/03/17), so I was unable to provide anymore physical items than the week prior.

We agreed that during the time of this meeting and the time of recording the drums properly (2/04/17), I could practice the production techniques I had researched, meaning that when it comes to implementing said mentioned techniques I am aware of how they work with relation to the various musical elements within my songs. Though I would not be practicing on the final product, it would at least allow me to recognise how these techniques work and how I can implement them into the final product.

Alongside this, I had also learned that opposed to keeping organisation notes, practice notes, recording notes and progression notes to myself, these are elements I can incorporate into my blog, which would allow external parties to understand the process of how we are progressing throughout the project. Thus, from this point onward I will be ensuring all prior and future developments as prior mentioned are uploaded onto the blog.

David Meeting – Week 6 (3/03/17)

Week 6’s meeting covered me having traveled back to Nottingham to practice my tracks with the drummer, allowing us both to feel more comfortable performing with each other and knowing exactly how each other are going to perform our respective musical parts throughout the duration of tracks, thus giving us a better feel and grasp of the tracks prior to the recording process. David was happy I had done this and expressed how important it is for all of the instrumentation to be locked in with the drums, with the rehearsal process aiding this relationship of musical elements.

David expressed the importance of my research addressing my learning outcomes i.e. providing examples of ways various producers (not just the ones I’ve deeply researched) utilize vocal production techniques.

For the following week, I am going to do complete the research for the three main producers I have looked at (Nigel Godrich, Anton Newcombe, Beck) alongside researching production techniques that pertain relevance to my LO’s.

 

For the following week, I am

Beck – Producer

Beck Hansen (Beck) is a multi-instrumentalist, songwriter and producer who became well known within the music industry during the 90s due to his unique style of incorporated musical elements from a wide array of musical genres, from acoustic, blues to hip hop and pop, often including sampling techniques to cut between these styles to create his unique style.

Taking a look at Beck’s 1996 album ‘Odelay’, we can have a better understanding of how he acquired the success he has over the years, largely influenced by the pure amount of different relationships he had established with producers and musicians throughout the years. Though Beck was the predominant producer, he did collaborate with The Dust Brothers, Mario Caldato Jr, Brian Paulson, Tom Rothrock and Rob Schnapf (Music Tech, 2014). Mike Simpson and John King (The Dust Brothers). Impressed by Beck’s ability to skip between different musical genres, The Dust Brothers consisting of Mike Simpson and John King wanted to get an idea of who he was, later to find out they share many of the same musical interests (Spencer, 2011). Inspired by the lack of pressure due to the presumption that Beck was a ‘one-hit-wonder’, the two parties felt a sense of ease when it came to the making of ‘Odelay’.

Seeing how Beck had approached the creative process on his successful 2013 album ‘Morning Phase’, a considerable amount of the included instrumentation is predicated on the involvement of a range of creative minds coming together. During the recording stage, Beck “recorded the basic tracks for most of Morning Phase [..] in three days of tracking”, whereby after he spent “almost half a year on his own” trying to figure it all out and thinking about “how to make it all work” (Frick, 2013).

Incorporation of Beck’s production approaches/techniques in my own production

Inspired by the way Beck approached the production process for ‘Odelay’, I very much want to replicate the idea of ‘sampling’; chopping up, editing and manipulating audio in a variety of different manors to achieve something new. I’m extremely excited about working with this technique; having a plethora of musical objects to which I can trial and error with. Seeing whether a cabasa could be placed within a particular section of the chorus, editing parts of collaborative vocals to see if a low hum fits underneath an acoustic guitar verse – just experimenting with the musical instances I have to create something I wouldn’t necessarily have thought of.

I will also be incorporating the collaborative efforts Beck introduces within his work to the production side of my tracks too. Most of the artists/creative minds I am working with for this project are all individuals I have known for years that know me, know how I approach music and are just enthusiastic minds with great ideas. I want to get a grasp of how they hear the music, what ideas they have and bring these ideas into the tracks, so they’re not just my songs, but the people that help support me as well. An instance of this can be found for example in Session #2 of ‘Sessions with Pete’, where I had heard a particular way in my head of how the rhythm of the drums would be for ‘Wait’, but I much preferred how Pete was playing it during the verse sections. The drums were originally supposed to be rimshots during the verse. but I felt his take on the verse was much better than mine, so we stuck with that. As Pete, Thomas and Anthony all have different musical tastes, they’ll all have different ways of approaching my music, based on their prior experiences, tastes, and emotions, so for me I find it important to incorporate these into my records in the same way Beck has over the years.

In terms of a stylistic approach, I love the clarity of the acoustic guitars on Beck’s ‘Morning Phase’ album, more specifically the song ‘Morning’. His acoustic guitar has a very smooth, even frequency response and was recorded incredibly dry, yet has a lovely reverb placed on it during the mixing process that compliments the low-end frequency content of the acoustic guitar. I am very much inspired by this, yet want a slightly more distant, relaxed acoustic guitar sound for “You and I” – so it’s not directly in your face, yet the top end clarity is clear and crisp.

References

David Frick (2013) Beck’s Long Road to ‘Morning Phase’. [online] Rolling Stone. Available from http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/becks-long-road-to-morning-phase-20131121 [Accessed 16 March 2017].

Music Tech (2014) Landmark Productions: Beck – Odelay. [online] Available from: http://www.musictech.net/2014/11/landmark-productions-beck-odelay/ [Accessed 26 February 2017].

Rex Otaegui (2014) Beck – Morning [HQ w/Lyrics]. [online video] YouTube. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvKbBkiYN9Y [Accessed 26 February 2017].

Roy Spencer (2011) The making of Beck’s Odelay: Dust Brother Mike Simpson’s track-by-track guide. [online] Music Radar. Available from http://www.musicradar.com/news/tech/the-making-of-becks-odelay-dust-brother-mike-simpsons-track-by-track-guide-401512 [Accessed 26 February 2017].

David Meeting – Week 5 (24/02/17)

During our meeting this Friday we began by discussing where the project currently was in terms of collaborating with musicians. David suggested that I should arrange some rehearsal dates with the musicians I am collaborating with between now and the day of recording drums (early April), so that when it comes down to tracking everyone knows exactly what they should be doing and we’re all on the same page.

Following this, I asked David what he thought of my blog post on Anton Newcombe, in particular how I went about displaying his production approaches and how I intend to implement them. David was very happy with how I worded this blog post, so I will definitely follow a similar way when writing future blog posts (i.e section of research followed by section of integration of research into project).

During the following week, I am going to complete the lyrics to all of my tracks and try to schedule a trip down to Nottingham to rehearse with the main musician I will be working with.

Anton Newcombe – Producer

brian-jonestown-massacre-ws-1440

Anton Newcombe is a Californian singer, songwriter, producer and multi-instrumentalist, most known for his psychedelic rock band ‘The Brian Jonestown Massacre’ (from now on referred to as ‘BJM’).

In an interview with Tenement TV (2016) [3:05-4:58], Newcombe mentions that he has been inspired by a variety of Scottish musical personnel. He states that he is really loves the approach Jesus & Mary Chain took towards the creation and production process in what he calls ‘do-it-yourself culture’ – this being the idea of creating your own songs, having a vision of what you want them to sound like an executing this, regardless of finances/resources/equipment. The whole organic nature of creating music according to how you feel, using it as an expressive medium more-so than one with alternative motives seems to be integral to how Newcombe has worked over the years, for better or worse.

When asked a question about sustaining his level of creativity over the duration of his career, Newcome introduces the concept of creating your own culture (Tenement TV, 2016) [6:03-6:54] by connecting with people, developing an “ecosystem” – a “little community” of people creating something that brings people together – forming a “folk” culture. A lot of this stems from him just “bumping into people” [9:09] and figuring out who exactly the person is behind the music and using his music as a platform for that person to find themselves. This approach to collaborating with individuals in an industry is one of the distinctive aspects of not only who he is as a creative mind but also of the music itself, as you can very much hear this collaboration across BJM’s music. Using their fourth album ‘Their Satanic Majesties’ Second Request’ album as an example, their liner notes are the following:

“acoustic guitar, sitar, clavs, mellotron, tambora, echoplex-feedback-generator, electric guitar, dumbek, tablas, flute, farfisa, recorder, tape loops, drums, acoustic bass, shinni, chanter, didgeridoo, vox jaguar, French horn, viola, tuba, SMS serge, 12-string electric guitar, harmonium, tambourines, cabasa, conga, jimbe, accordion, celeste, glockenspiel, bells, fish, piano, hammond, cello, wolf horn, maracas, weird-fucking-Chinese-shit, tyco drum, vibes, woodwinds and other top secret crap.”

This level of collaboration is what exactly provided Newcombe with the sound he was looking for. This album was recorded at Bloody Angle Studios in San Francisco, produced by Dave Deresinski and Naut Humon (Discogs, 2017).

During an interview Newcombe participated in for Louder Than War, he mentions that he often wants to create an “album experience” when creating his albums, as opposed the disjointed, singles-driven market we live in today (Stanley, 2014). This explains why many of his tracks feel like they belong together – it’s because he didn’t create them in isolation, they were always meant to be listened to collectively.

How does his production approach inform my own?

The idea of ‘do-it-yourself’ culture has a big appeal to me with this project – I feel like there is the chance to overproduce the tracks to the extent that its devoid of the emotion I’ve put into making the songs, and more so just turning into a ‘commercial mix’. Though I believe the mix will be commercially viable, I don’t want it to share some of the qualities of modern mixes, including every sound sounding ‘full’, rhythms being clinically constructed and being rigid in nature. I want my mixes to have a real sense of rhythm, not DAW ‘grid-induced rhythm’ and this can be achieved by having the drums recorded as well as they can be in one take and in time. Obviously, there will be edits between takes and to correct early/late rhythmic elements, but it’s more of a correction tool as opposed to an overhaul tool. In terms of not every musical instance sounding ‘full’ I’ll be using the full extent of the audible frequency spectrum, having low-end thumps from boxes and perhaps Cajon to carry the sense of rhythm, to guitars played through converted radio amplifiers to give a crunchy lo-fi distortion to thin weedy guitar hooks. This way the mixes will be audibly pleasing due to the full utilization of the audible frequency spectrum (we don’t live in a world where the ‘overall mix’ of sounds is mixed with a HPF at 50 kHz and a LPF at 8 kHz), which we as humans sound satisfying. Compression won’t be overall ‘heavy’ throughout – for some instances of electric guitar I may decide to compress them heavily to get a particular sound, but it will be more so for the effect I want as opposed to just ‘what you do’.

I also will be adopting the approach of using a wide array of physical instruments, from the voice, guitars, and drums, to less western instruments including djembe, didgeridoo and cabasa. This for me would be a great approach to emphasise the emotional content I am trying to push behind each song and create a multi-cultural sound, similar to the likes of BJM.

His take on collaboration is very inspiring for me – something I very much want to ingrain within my music. It’s great for me to create my music, but if I’m creating music with others it’s very much theirs as much as mine, so I want to use my music as a vehicle to connect with passionate people and use it as a means of shining a light on interesting people with interesting views and ideas.

Bibliography

Carl Stanley (2014) Louder Than War Interview: Anton Newcombe of the Brian Jonestown Massacre. [online] Louder Than War. Available from: http://louderthanwar.com/ltw-interview-anton-newcombe/ [Accessed 20 February 2017].

Discogs (2017) The Brian Jonestown Massacre – Their Satanic Majesties’ Second Request. [online]. Discogs. Available from: https://www.discogs.com/The-Brian-Jonestown-Massacre-Their-Satanic-Majesties-Second-Request/release/3643344 [Accessed 20 February 2017].

Tenement TV (2016) TTV TALKS: Anton Newcombe The Brian Jonestown Massacre Barrowlands 2016. YouTube. [online] Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1eEuE1-JA0 [Accessed 20 February 2017].